<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS extensions by Google Base</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2005/11/16/rss-extensions-by-google-base/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2005/11/16/rss-extensions-by-google-base/</link>
	<description>EBB is the ebiquity research group\\\'s blog at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC).  We focus on technologies that facilitate the design, implementation and control of distributed, intelligent information systems -- mobile and pervasive computing, ad hoc networking, multiagent systems, knowledge representation and reasoning, and the semantic web.  As the tides of technology ebb and flow, we hope the good ideas wash up on our beach and the bad ones drift back out to sea.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Casual.info.in.a.bottle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Base, RDF, Semantic Web e molto fermento&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2005/11/16/rss-extensions-by-google-base/#comment-10605</link>
		<dc:creator>Casual.info.in.a.bottle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Base, RDF, Semantic Web e molto fermento&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=401#comment-10605</guid>
		<description>[...] -&#62; RSS extensions by Google Base  * Google has defined a new namespace (http://base.google.com/ns/1.0) to support these attributes. Are we seeing the first formal adoption of Semantic Web concepts (by Google) here? * Google Base letâ€™s users create new schemas (attributes). For instance, an example from Google Base shows how â€œlanguage_skillsâ€? attribute can be added to a job opening description. I wonder how these new namespaces are ingested by Google Base? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] -&gt; RSS extensions by Google Base  * Google has defined a new namespace (http://base.google.com/ns/1.0) to support these attributes. Are we seeing the first formal adoption of Semantic Web concepts (by Google) here? * Google Base letâ€™s users create new schemas (attributes). For instance, an example from Google Base shows how â€œlanguage_skillsâ€? attribute can be added to a job opening description. I wonder how these new namespaces are ingested by Google Base? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voice Over IT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Base e Semantic Web: analogie?</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2005/11/16/rss-extensions-by-google-base/#comment-10604</link>
		<dc:creator>Voice Over IT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Base e Semantic Web: analogie?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=401#comment-10604</guid>
		<description>[...] -&#62; RSS extensions by Google Base  * Google has defined a new namespace (http://base.google.com/ns/1.0) to support these attributes. Are we seeing the first formal adoption of Semantic Web concepts (by Google) here? * Google Base letâ€™s users create new schemas (attributes). For instance, an example from Google Base shows how â€œlanguage_skillsâ€? attribute can be added to a job opening description. I wonder how these new namespaces are ingested by Google Base? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] -&gt; RSS extensions by Google Base  * Google has defined a new namespace (http://base.google.com/ns/1.0) to support these attributes. Are we seeing the first formal adoption of Semantic Web concepts (by Google) here? * Google Base letâ€™s users create new schemas (attributes). For instance, an example from Google Base shows how â€œlanguage_skillsâ€? attribute can be added to a job opening description. I wonder how these new namespaces are ingested by Google Base? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
