<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Scholar, it&#8217;s a good thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/01/25/google-scholar-its-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/01/25/google-scholar-its-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>EBB is the ebiquity research group\\\'s blog at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC).  We focus on technologies that facilitate the design, implementation and control of distributed, intelligent information systems -- mobile and pervasive computing, ad hoc networking, multiagent systems, knowledge representation and reasoning, and the semantic web.  As the tides of technology ebb and flow, we hope the good ideas wash up on our beach and the bad ones drift back out to sea.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brickley</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/01/25/google-scholar-its-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-14434</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=450#comment-14434</guid>
		<description>I quite agree re IFPs and OWL... except for one thing --- the DL variants don&#039;t like it at all, in cases where a string valued property (like googleScholarKey) is inverse-functional. Consequently, if you run a well-known namespace and have such a construct, you&#039;re guaranteed to get a lot of mail from unhappy Description Logic enthusiasts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite agree re IFPs and OWL&#8230; except for one thing &#8212; the DL variants don&#8217;t like it at all, in cases where a string valued property (like googleScholarKey) is inverse-functional. Consequently, if you run a well-known namespace and have such a construct, you&#8217;re guaranteed to get a lot of mail from unhappy Description Logic enthusiasts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

