<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RDF/A: embedding RDF in XHTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/02/01/rdfa-embedding-rdf-in-xhtml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/02/01/rdfa-embedding-rdf-in-xhtml/</link>
	<description>EBB is the ebiquity research group\\\'s blog at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC).  We focus on technologies that facilitate the design, implementation and control of distributed, intelligent information systems -- mobile and pervasive computing, ad hoc networking, multiagent systems, knowledge representation and reasoning, and the semantic web.  As the tides of technology ebb and flow, we hope the good ideas wash up on our beach and the bad ones drift back out to sea.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:39:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Finin</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/02/01/rdfa-embedding-rdf-in-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-14766</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Finin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=462#comment-14766</guid>
		<description>If I had to pick a universal representation, it might be natural language.  Microformats is an interesting idea, but it&#039;s not rich enough for many applications and does not have a well defined semantics.  Of course, this could be an advantage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to pick a universal representation, it might be natural language.  Microformats is an interesting idea, but it&#8217;s not rich enough for many applications and does not have a well defined semantics.  Of course, this could be an advantage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan king</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/02/01/rdfa-embedding-rdf-in-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-14633</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=462#comment-14633</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I think that this is incredibly important as many of the use cases for the Semantic Web can benefit from documents that have both human and machine readable portions&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why not &lt;a href=&quot;http://microformats.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one representation that can be read by both&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I think that this is incredibly important as many of the use cases for the Semantic Web can benefit from documents that have both human and machine readable portions</p></blockquote>
<p>Why not <a href="http://microformats.org/" rel="nofollow">one representation that can be read by both</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
