<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel explains withdrawl from OLPC board</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2008/01/05/intel-explains-withdrawl-from-olpc-board/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2008/01/05/intel-explains-withdrawl-from-olpc-board/</link>
	<description>EBB is the ebiquity research group\\\'s blog at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC).  We focus on technologies that facilitate the design, implementation and control of distributed, intelligent information systems -- mobile and pervasive computing, ad hoc networking, multiagent systems, knowledge representation and reasoning, and the semantic web.  As the tides of technology ebb and flow, we hope the good ideas wash up on our beach and the bad ones drift back out to sea.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Biz Tech Talk Blog</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2008/01/05/intel-explains-withdrawl-from-olpc-board/comment-page-1/#comment-16397</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Biz Tech Talk Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2008/01/05/intel-explains-withdrawl-from-olpc-board/#comment-16397</guid>
		<description>The OLPC plan has been a controversy lately, and many computer companies have been posing objections to its philosophies.  I would be curious to hear more from computer companies regarding their objections (more specifically) and also more from others running the OLPC program to hear exactly what the long-term plans are.  The program definitely poses some interesting opportunities in the computer world and also could potentially give technology professionals some interesting new ways to get involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OLPC plan has been a controversy lately, and many computer companies have been posing objections to its philosophies.  I would be curious to hear more from computer companies regarding their objections (more specifically) and also more from others running the OLPC program to hear exactly what the long-term plans are.  The program definitely poses some interesting opportunities in the computer world and also could potentially give technology professionals some interesting new ways to get involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

