UMBC ebiquity research group Building intelligent systems in open, heterogeneous, dynamic, distributed environments
The XKCD data died in a blogging accident

The XKCD data died in a blogging accident

Tim Finin, 1:49pm 13 January 2008



The popular XKCD had another Web related comic yesterday, but it trned out to be self-negating. As was noted on Slashdot:

“As I noted yesterday (and was joined by many others)… in an offhand observation xkcd has singlehandedly changed a small section of the Internet. Changing the results from a Google search for “Died in a Blogging Accident” from 2 to (at this writing) over 7,170 in a little more than 24 hours.”

The number of results are now up to 13.3K 66.1K (8/10/08). I guess something like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle applies to the Internet, too.

Update 1/15: Here’s a trend graph from blogpulse for occurrences of “died in a blogging accident” in blogs as of 09:00 gmt+5 on 15 January 2008. Click graph to see current data.


mentions of ‘died in a blogging accident’ in blogs as of 15 Jan 2008 09:00 gmt+5 via blogpulse

Update 1/16: Google trends shows a sudden interest in the dangers of blogging las week. Here’s a graph from 16 January 2008. Click on the graph to see the current trend graph.


Google searches as of 16 Jan 08 for ‘died in a blogging accident’

19 Responses to “The XKCD data died in a blogging accident”

  1. Ruth Says:

    That’s hilarious!

  2. Tim Says:

    this is great! I just stumbled the original comic, and without knowing the trend, i immediately searched google for ‘died in a blogging accident’, thus adding to the fury :) I F’in love stumbleupon, its giving birth to every corner of the net-o-sphere~

  3. Toni Says:

    I did the same thing as Tim, I was confused for the moment then saw this. I do find this quite amusing.

  4. Bill Vincent Says:

    7,130,000 now. Great stuff.

  5. Bernard Says:

    Bill Vincent, you forgot the quotes. It’s more like 15,000 now.

  6. Seth Says:

    What do you mean? “died in a blogging accident” returns over 60,000 results…

  7. LeesyKate Says:

    there’s about 6,170,000 results now. Just so you know.

    I love XKCD…

  8. Todd Says:

    …I just want to find the original two results. =|

  9. Olivia Says:

    I LOVE XKCD!!!!

  10. Woo! Says:

    script, search, DATA1, begin
    if (DATA1 != 0), #If my number of searches for “Died in a Blogging accident” is not equal to #zero
    then (increment(DATA1)) # Increase number of searches by one
    end

  11. Wyrd Says:

    I got to this page by querying Google for “died in a blogging accident”, so I am one of the data points.
    /emote waves at fellow data points.


    Furry cows moo and decompress.

  12. Cassidy Says:

    Lol that is so funny, I just saw the comic and immediately Googled it….What do you know, way more than 2 results!
    XKCD rocks!

  13. TBA Says:

    hah.. amazing… just tried it out..

  14. Squeegy Says:

    There are also 602,000 results for ‘died in a knitting accident’ now.

  15. Vicky Says:

    I wonder if the same will happen for the one about google searches for “X girls Y cups” tho i don’t think I want to try that one.

  16. Aaron Says:

    As of this post, Google gives “about 77,500″ results for “died in a blogging accident” (with quotes). This page is the first result.

  17. Guillermo Says:

    Only 1840 for me, one month later… Weird. Anyone can explain?

  18. Alden Says:

    As of 7th October 2009, 10:18pm (GMT+8)

    Results 1 – 10 of about 1,020,000 for died in a blogging accident. (0.30 seconds)

    Xkcd ftw.

  19. Aqeel Says:

    87,600…
    I think some people are doing it with quotes, some without
    @ Guillermo, I did it with quotes, so I don’t know how you could get that…maybe your advanced search settings or something?

    I just love these internet trend things, especially with Google Trends or something similar to see how it changes

Leave a Reply







UMBC