<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: xkcd on the correlation between correlation and causation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/03/06/xkcd-on-the-correlation-between-correlation-and-causation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/03/06/xkcd-on-the-correlation-between-correlation-and-causation/</link>
	<description>EBB is the ebiquity research group\\\'s blog at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC).  We focus on technologies that facilitate the design, implementation and control of distributed, intelligent information systems -- mobile and pervasive computing, ad hoc networking, multiagent systems, knowledge representation and reasoning, and the semantic web.  As the tides of technology ebb and flow, we hope the good ideas wash up on our beach and the bad ones drift back out to sea.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/03/06/xkcd-on-the-correlation-between-correlation-and-causation/comment-page-1/#comment-28594</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=1799#comment-28594</guid>
		<description>Based on a large sample of studies, I measured the correlation between correlation and causation to be 0.977 - strong enough to believe that, for all practical purposes, correlation causes causation.

http://ghill.customer.netspace.net.au/correlation-causation.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on a large sample of studies, I measured the correlation between correlation and causation to be 0.977 &#8211; strong enough to believe that, for all practical purposes, correlation causes causation.</p>
<p><a href="http://ghill.customer.netspace.net.au/correlation-causation.html" rel="nofollow">http://ghill.customer.netspace.net.au/correlation-causation.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breanna</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/03/06/xkcd-on-the-correlation-between-correlation-and-causation/comment-page-1/#comment-28531</link>
		<dc:creator>Breanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=1799#comment-28531</guid>
		<description>haha, I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seinberg</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/03/06/xkcd-on-the-correlation-between-correlation-and-causation/comment-page-1/#comment-28506</link>
		<dc:creator>Seinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=1799#comment-28506</guid>
		<description>The mouseover text on the xkcd image is great too: &quot;but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing &#039;look over there&#039; &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mouseover text on the xkcd image is great too: &#8220;but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing &#8216;look over there&#8217; &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/03/06/xkcd-on-the-correlation-between-correlation-and-causation/comment-page-1/#comment-28505</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=1799#comment-28505</guid>
		<description>Wired says that the correlation/causation distinction is quaint and obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wired says that the correlation/causation distinction is quaint and obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

