<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scantegrity cryptographic voting system to be used in binding governmental election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/04/02/scantegrity-cryptographic-voting-system-to-be-used-in-binding-governmental-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/04/02/scantegrity-cryptographic-voting-system-to-be-used-in-binding-governmental-election/</link>
	<description>EBB is the ebiquity research group\\\'s blog at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC).  We focus on technologies that facilitate the design, implementation and control of distributed, intelligent information systems -- mobile and pervasive computing, ad hoc networking, multiagent systems, knowledge representation and reasoning, and the semantic web.  As the tides of technology ebb and flow, we hope the good ideas wash up on our beach and the bad ones drift back out to sea.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Finin</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/04/02/scantegrity-cryptographic-voting-system-to-be-used-in-binding-governmental-election/comment-page-1/#comment-29159</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Finin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=1816#comment-29159</guid>
		<description>Yes, this is an important attribute.  Scantegrity uses a privacy-preserving receipt.  Read the entry on Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scantegrity, for an explanation and then move on to the papers on Scantegrity and earlier related systems if you want the details on how it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is an important attribute.  Scantegrity uses a privacy-preserving receipt.  Read the entry on Wikipedia, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scantegrity" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scantegrity</a>, for an explanation and then move on to the papers on Scantegrity and earlier related systems if you want the details on how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geek gadgets</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/04/02/scantegrity-cryptographic-voting-system-to-be-used-in-binding-governmental-election/comment-page-1/#comment-29158</link>
		<dc:creator>geek gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=1816#comment-29158</guid>
		<description>Isn’t one of the hallmarks of a good voting system is plausible deniability? If my employer can have me turn in my “key” to figuring out if my vote was counted correctly can’t that employer also coerce me into voting a certain way?

This is what I was thinking too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn’t one of the hallmarks of a good voting system is plausible deniability? If my employer can have me turn in my “key” to figuring out if my vote was counted correctly can’t that employer also coerce me into voting a certain way?</p>
<p>This is what I was thinking too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juice</title>
		<link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/04/02/scantegrity-cryptographic-voting-system-to-be-used-in-binding-governmental-election/comment-page-1/#comment-29091</link>
		<dc:creator>juice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/?p=1816#comment-29091</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t one of the hallmarks of a good voting system is plausible deniability? If my employer can have me turn in my &quot;key&quot; to figuring out if my vote was counted correctly can&#039;t that employer also coerce me into voting a certain way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t one of the hallmarks of a good voting system is plausible deniability? If my employer can have me turn in my &#8220;key&#8221; to figuring out if my vote was counted correctly can&#8217;t that employer also coerce me into voting a certain way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

