<?xml version="1.0"?>

<!DOCTYPE owl [
  <!ENTITY rdf "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <!ENTITY rdfs "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
  <!ENTITY xsd "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#">
  <!ENTITY owl "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#">
  <!ENTITY cc "http://web.resource.org/cc/#">
  <!ENTITY event "http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/ontology/event.owl#">
  <!ENTITY person "http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/ontology/person.owl#">
  <!ENTITY assert "http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/ontology/assertion.owl#">]>

<!--
  This ontology document is licensed under the Creative Commons
  Attribution License. To view a copy of this license, visit
  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ or send a letter to
  Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California
  94305, USA.
-->

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf = "&rdf;"
  xmlns:rdfs = "&rdfs;"
  xmlns:xsd = "&xsd;"
  xmlns:owl = "&owl;"
  xmlns:cc = "&cc;"
  xmlns:event = "&event;"
  xmlns:person = "&person;"
  xmlns:assert = "&assert;">
  <event:Event rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/event/html/id/264/An-Efficient-Method-for-Probabilistic-Knowledge-Integration">
    <rdfs:label><![CDATA[An Efficient Method for Probabilistic Knowledge Integration]]></rdfs:label>
    <event:title><![CDATA[An Efficient Method for Probabilistic Knowledge Integration]]></event:title>
    <event:speaker><person:PhDStudent rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/person/html/Shenyong/Zhang/"><person:name><![CDATA[Shenyong  Zhang]]></person:name><rdfs:label><![CDATA[Shenyong  Zhang]]></rdfs:label></person:PhDStudent></event:speaker>
    <event:startDate rdf:datatype="&xsd;dateTime">2008-10-14T10:30:00-05:00</event:startDate>
    <event:endDate rdf:datatype="&xsd;dateTime">2008-10-14T12:00:00-05:00</event:endDate>
    <event:location><![CDATA[346 ITE]]></event:location>
    <event:abstract><![CDATA[Probabilistic information can come from many different sources and tends to 
involve a <i> part </i> of the domain. How can we integrate the different information about probabilities, especially when they may be inconsistent?
<p>
   There are several methods dealing with this problem, such as the well
known <i>iterative proportional fitting procedure</i> (IPFP),
proposed by R. Kruithof in 1937 for situations that are consistent,  and the GEMA algorithm (Generalized Expectation Maximization Algorithm) given
by Jirka Vomlel 1999 for inconsistent situations. IPFP does not converge
in inconsistent situations but alternates among among a set of certain
states. For GEMA, it is very data sensitive and its computation involve
the whole knowledge base (denoted as joint probability distribution
(JPD) here), so it is very expensive.
<p> 

   We proposed a new method SMOOTH to address this problem. The goal is to
deal with both consistent and inconsistent constraints. Our basic idea is to do a modification bi-directionally. When IPFP goes into alternation, we modify the constraints according to the entire JPD, so the certain
alternating states can be driven to closer. Experiment results verify
that SMOOTH works well for both consistent and inconsistent constraints.
Moreover, SMOOTH is data insensitive, factorizable and can be
accelerated. We describe a use case for  belief updating in Bayesian networks via the
virtual evidence method.
]]></event:abstract>
    <event:uri><![CDATA[http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/event/html/id/264/]]></event:uri>
    <event:host><person:PrincipalFaculty rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/person/html/Yun/Peng/"><person:name><![CDATA[Yun  Peng]]></person:name><rdfs:label><![CDATA[Yun  Peng]]></rdfs:label></person:PrincipalFaculty></event:host>
  </event:Event>

  <rdf:Description rdf:about="">
    <cc:License rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
  </rdf:Description>

</rdf:RDF>

