<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
 >
<!--
	This ontology document is licensed under the Creative Commons
	Attribution License. To view a copy of this license, visit
	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ or send a letter to
	Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California
	94305, USA.
-->
 <channel rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu//tags/html/?t=genai">
  <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
  <title><![CDATA[UMBC ebiquity RSS Tag Search]]></title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://ebiquity.umbc.edu//tags/html/?t=genai]]></link>
  <description><![CDATA[UMBC ebiquity RSS Tag Search for genai]]></description>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      <rdf:li resource="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/paper/html/id/1173/GenAIPABench-A-Benchmark-for-Generative-AI-based-Privacy-Assistants"/>
      <rdf:li resource="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/394/After-75-years-of-AI-Can-Machines-Think-"/>
      <rdf:li resource="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/397/GenAI-in-Formative-Assessment-of-Student-Learning"/>
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
 </channel>
 <item rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/paper/html/id/1173/GenAIPABench-A-Benchmark-for-Generative-AI-based-Privacy-Assistants">
  <title><![CDATA[GenAIPABench: A Benchmark for Generative AI-based Privacy Assistants]]></title>
  <link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/paper/html/id/1173/GenAIPABench-A-Benchmark-for-Generative-AI-based-Privacy-Assistants</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Website privacy policies are often lengthy and intricate. Privacy assistants assist in simplifying policies and making them more accessible and user-friendly. The emergence of generative AI (genAI) offers new opportunities to build privacy assistants that can answer users’ questions about privacy policies. However, genAI’s reliability is a concern due to its potential for producing inaccurate information. This study introduces GenAIPABench, a benchmark for evaluating Generative AI-based P...]]></description>
  <dc:date>2024-07-01</dc:date>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/394/After-75-years-of-AI-Can-Machines-Think-">
  <title><![CDATA[After 75 years of AI, Can Machines Think?]]></title>
  <link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/394/After-75-years-of-AI-Can-Machines-Think-</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Mathematician Alan Turing proposed a simple test to answer the question 'Can machines think?' nearly 75 years ago. Today, the surprising abilities of the latest generative AI systems make many wonder if we can finally respond positively. The talk briefly covers AI's history leading up to the recent development of systems using neural networks and large language models like ChatGPT and what to expect in the next few years.

A presentation given at the Charlestown Retirement Community on Apri...]]></description>
  <dc:date>2025-04-10</dc:date>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/397/GenAI-in-Formative-Assessment-of-Student-Learning">
  <title><![CDATA[GenAI in Formative Assessment of Student Learning]]></title>
  <link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/397/GenAI-in-Formative-Assessment-of-Student-Learning</link>
  <description><![CDATA[If students were persuaded that AI could fairly and accurately assess their ungraded (formative) practice, might faculty be willing and able to provide more opportunities for them to do so? If so, would it make a difference in more high-stakes (summative) assessments like midterm and final exams or assignments? If so, how might faculty best nudge and support students to take advantage of AI-assisted practice?

In this panel presentation, three faculty from three colleges show and tell how a...]]></description>
  <dc:date>2025-05-14</dc:date>
 </item>
</rdf:RDF>
