<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
 >
<!--
	This ontology document is licensed under the Creative Commons
	Attribution License. To view a copy of this license, visit
	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ or send a letter to
	Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California
	94305, USA.
-->
 <channel rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu//tags/html/?t=slogs">
  <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
  <title><![CDATA[UMBC ebiquity RSS Tag Search]]></title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://ebiquity.umbc.edu//tags/html/?t=slogs]]></link>
  <description><![CDATA[UMBC ebiquity RSS Tag Search for slogs]]></description>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      <rdf:li resource="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/paper/html/id/326/BlogVox-Separating-Blog-Wheat-from-Blog-Chaff"/>
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
 </channel>
 <item rdf:about="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/paper/html/id/326/BlogVox-Separating-Blog-Wheat-from-Blog-Chaff">
  <title><![CDATA[BlogVox: Separating Blog Wheat from Blog Chaff]]></title>
  <link>http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/paper/html/id/326/BlogVox-Separating-Blog-Wheat-from-Blog-Chaff</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Blog posts are often informally written, poorly structured, rife with
spelling and grammatical errors, and feature non-traditional
content. These characteristics make them difficult to process with
standard language analysis tools.  Performing linguistic analysis on
blogs is plagued by two additional problems: (i) the presence of spam
blogs and spam comments and (ii) extraneous non-content including
blog-rolls, link-rolls, advertisements and sidebars. We describe
techniques designed to...]]></description>
  <dc:date>2007-01-07</dc:date>
 </item>
</rdf:RDF>
